Faithful Christians and Jews believe the Bible is a rich resource for understanding ancient cultures and history, and that it teaches us God's desire for our lives. Others, sometimes called Bible Minimalists, reject almost everything recorded in the Bible. How can we know which view is correct? What do the critics claim?
Julius Wellhausen's<1> influential book, Prologue to the History of Israel, was published in 1878. He advocated for, and extended, an already proposed theory known as the "documentary hypothesis." <2> It claims that the Old Testament was woven together from multiple sources at a time far later than the events they report. If that is true, then the Old Testament dates and events should not be trusted.
Dating Old Testament Events
His hypothesis been tested. Archaeological researchers discovered many artifacts, and even ancient documents, in the two and a half centuries since Wellhausen's book was published. Archeology is a slow and laborious process in the best of circumstances. Wars and politics in the Middle East add to the difficulties. We can not expect perfect agreement with written records, whether the Bible or any other source. Yet, many discoveries support the Old Testament accounts.
For example, the defeat of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, is reported in the Bible:
Jehoiachin king of Judah, his mother, his attendants, his nobles and his officials all surrendered to him. In the eighth year of the reign of the king of Babylon, he took Jehoiachin prisoner ... Nebuchadnezzar took Jehoiachin captive to Babylon. He also took from Jerusalem to Babylon the king's mother, his wives, his officials and the prominent people of the land.
2 Kings 24:12-15, [NIV]HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® by Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved., Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by International Bible Society publisher: International Bible Society
This was a devastating and humiliating event, yet the Bible reports it. That is evidence the event is accurately recorded. What culture would discredit themselves with a lie?
When did this happen? The Bible tells us it was the eighth year of Nebuchadnezzar's reign.
Time spans between important events are recorded in the Bible, for example:
In the eighteenth year of the reign of Jeroboam, Abijah became king of Judah, and he reigned in Jerusalem three years. His mother's name was Maakah, a daughter of Uriel of Gibeah. There was war between Abijah and Jeroboam.
Second Chronicles 13:1-2, [NIV]HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® by Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved., Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by International Bible Society publisher: International Bible Society
Valerius Coucke <3> used these records, along with information available outside the Bible, in 1925, to compute the initial fall of Jerusalem to 597 BC. An English translation of his article can be found at this link. <4>
Was Coucke correct? The "Babylonian Chronicles" are a collection of cuneiform inscribed clay tablets. One of them, cataloged as ABC 5, is known as the Nebuchadnezzar Chronicle. It records the first eleven years of his reign as king of Babylon. It was first translated in 1956 by Donald Wiseman, <5> and was not available when Coucke wrote his article. Wiseman's translation includes:
In the seventh year (of Nebuchadnezzar) in the month Chislev (Nov/Dec) the king of Babylon assembled his army, and after he had invaded the land of Hatti (Turkey/Syria) he laid siege to the city of Judah. On the second day of the month of Adar (16 March) he conquered the city and took the king (Jeconiah) prisoner. He installed in his place a king (Zedekiah) of his own choice, and after he had received rich tribute, he sent forth to Babylon.
Wikipedia Nebuchadnezzar Chronicle <6>
We now know even the day of the year when Jehoiachin was taken captive:
This date was confirmed in 1956 with the publication of the Babylonian Chronicle that showed that the captivity of Jehoiachin began on the second of Adar (April 16), 597 B.C. This illustrates a general truth: our understanding of the historical texts of the Bible has been enhanced by progress in both exegesis and archeology. In the proper use of the inductive method, neither of these disciplines can be neglected.
Roger Young, page 4 of a book review.<7>
Agreement with events recorded in the Bible and sources outside the Bible raise our confidence in the accuracy of the Old Testament.
Dating New Testament Events
At the same time Julius Wellhausen and others, were casting doubt on the Old Testament, the New Testament was also attacked. As William Ramsay put it in 1914:
I ... dutifully accepted the current opinion that it [Acts] was written during the second half of the second century [AD 150 to 200] by an author who wished to influence the minds of people in his own time by a highly wrought and imaginative description of the early Church ... He wrote for his contemporaries, not for truth. He cared naught for geographical or historical surroundings ...
Such was the commonly accepted view in the critical school about 1870 to 1880, when I had been studying modern opinions. It is now utterly antiquated.
[Ram1914]The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament by W. M. Ramsay, 1914 publisher: ForgottenBooks.com pages 37 to 38
You may read my review of his 1914 book,
The Trustworthiness of the New Testament,
at this link.
<8>
The critics pointed at passages like this to discredit the book of Luke:
In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. (This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria.) And everyone went to their own town to register. So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child.
Luke 2:1-5, [NIV]HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® by Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved., Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by International Bible Society publisher: International Bible Society
They thought these details were impossible, inventions by the author, to give his story color. However, archaeological work done by Sir Ramsay and others proved these passages accurately reported the conditions of that time. This passage in Luke, together with records we now have from outside the Bible, enable an accurate estimate of the birth of Jesus Christ.
Biblical Text: Old Testament
Has the Biblical text we have today changed over time? The agreement with archaeological results provides evidence that the text is accurately preserved. Even better evidence exists though. We have ancient copies of many portions of the Old and New Testament. The most famous discovery was found near the Dead Sea:
In the winter of 1946-7, Bedouin shepherd Muhammed Edh-Dhib followed a goat into a cave near Qumran and emerged with 7 ancient scrolls. The finding led to the discovery of ten other caves over the ensuing decade yielding a total of 929 texts – scrolls housed in jars inside the caves – known collectively as the Dead Sea Scrolls. The scrolls include the oldest manuscripts of the Hebrew Biblical Scriptures ever found. Most have been carbon dated to the second and first century BC.
Ancient Qumran<9>
Before this discovery, the oldest copy of the Hebrew Bible was the Masoretic Text. The Leningrad Codex, the oldest copy of the Masoretic text is dated to the eleventh century AD. <10> Discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls changed scholarly opinion:
The texts are of great religious and historical significance, as they include some of the only known surviving copies of Biblical documents made before 100 BC and preserve evidence of late Second Temple Judaism. They are written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, mostly on parchment, but with some written on papyrus.
... Qumran, however, has provided remains of an early Masoretic edition predating the Christian era on which the traditional MT [Masoretic] is based. A comparison of the MT to this earlier text revealed the remarkable accuracy with which scribes copied the sacred texts. Accordingly, the integrity of the Hebrew Bible was confirmed, which generally has heightened its respect among scholars and drastically reduced textual alteration.
Dead Sea Scrolls at Textus-Receptus.com <11>
The most complete scrolls were found inside jars like those pictured at the top of this post. One of them is known as "The Great Isaiah Scroll." It is a nearly complete copy of the book of Isaiah. The above image shows a small portion of it.
Biblical Text: New Testament
When were the New Testament books written? Who wrote them? Are the texts we have now the same as the originals?
The oldest known scrap of any New Testament writing, pictured here, is known as P52. It includes parts of John 18:31-33 on the front (left in this picture), and John 18:37-38 on the back. You can view it in fine detail at this link. <12> The original, found near Cairo, Egypt, is housed in the John Rylands University Library, in Manchester, England. Experts in Greek writing estimate it was copied in the second century, perhaps around AD 150.
John was one of the apostles closest to Jesus. He wrote the Gospel bearing his name late in his life while he was in Ephesus, probably before AD 90. Ephesus is in what is now Turkey. Today the trip by car, according to Google Maps, is 2,553 km (1,586 miles), and takes 32 hours, without traffic.
This is evidence for the rapid and wide distribution of Greek copies of John's gospel. The text of this fragment, though short, agrees with the Greek of the same book we have today. <13> Many other ancient manuscripts have been found. The Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts <14> has digitized many of these ancient documents using modern multi-spectral imaging techniques, and displays them for all to see on their web site.
This partial codex (meaning ancient manuscripts that were in book format) of John's Gospel is in the Martin Bodmer collection at the Univeristé de Genève in Geneva, Switzerland. <15> It is dated to AD 200 plus or minus a few decades. It was collected by Martin Bodmer<16> in Cairo around 1950.
Many thousands of ancient copies of portions of the New Testament have been found and analyzed. Most of them are in Greek, but some are in Coptic, Aramaic, and other Middle East languages. The text of these ancient documents is essentially identical to the Bible we have today.
Constantine Tischendorf <17> discovered what is now known as Codex Sinaiticus in 1844 on his first visit to the remote Saint Catherine's Monastery, <18> high in the mountains of the Sinai peninsula. It is the oldest, nearly complete, copy of the Bible. Parts of it are stored in various museums around the world. Fortunately it is now carefully digitized and available on-line at CodexSinaiticus.org:
Codex Sinaiticus, a manuscript of the Christian Bible written in the middle of the fourth century, contains the earliest complete copy of the Christian New Testament. The hand-written text is in Greek. The New Testament appears in the original vernacular language (koine) and the Old Testament in the version, known as the Septuagint, that was adopted by early Greek-speaking Christians. In the Codex, the text of both the Septuagint and the New Testament has been heavily annotated by a series of early correctors.
The significance of Codex Sinaiticus for the reconstruction of the Christian Bible's original text, the history of the Bible and the history of Western book-making is immense.
https://codexSinaiticus.org<19>
Summary
I hope this post gives you enough information to trust the accuracy of the historical events reported by the Bible. The links above will help you discover many additional details. Work, and debate, continue. The Bible is an accurate and extensive record of ancient. It can also give you God's guidance for your life.
- <1>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Wellhausen
- <2>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_hypothesis
- <3>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Valerius_Coucke&oldid=1010429467
- <4>
- http://www.rcyoung.org/articles/coucke.pdf
- <5>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Wiseman
- <6>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebuchadnezzar_Chronicle#cite_note-9
- <7>
- https://www.academia.edu/34234496/Book_review_of_Andrew_Steinmann_From_Abraham_to_Paul_A_Biblical_Chronology_Concordia_2013_
- <8>
- https://PrincipledThinking.com/Article/Ramsay1914
- <9>
- http://qumran.com/ancient-qumran/
- <10>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masoretic_Text
- <11>
- http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls
- <12>
- https://manuscripts.csntm.org/manuscript/Group/GA_P52
- <13>
- https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2019/02/15/the-earliest-new-testament-manuscripts/
- <14>
- https://www.csntm.org/
- <15>
- https://bodmerlab.unige.ch/fr/constellations/papyri/barcode/1072205287
- <16>
- https://fondationbodmer.ch/en/martinbodmer/
- <17>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantin_von_Tischendorf
- <18>
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Catherine%27s_Monastery
- <19>
- https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/codex/
- NIV
- HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION® by Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved., Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by International Bible Society publisher: International Bible Society
- Ram1914
- The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament by W. M. Ramsay, 1914 publisher: ForgottenBooks.com